Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Britt v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1999No. Claim No. 95248Published

1Concurrence

Rosenberger, J. P.

(concurring). I concur in the result. However, since I cannot accept the majority’s recital of the facts, nor the conclusions drawn from them, I must write separately. None but a brief summary of the facts is needed.

Britt was charged with first-degree rape based on a sexual encounter which he described as consensual. He was incarcerated from the time of his arrest. He pleaded guilty to attempted first-degree rape with an agreed sentence of 4 to 8 years. His motion to withdraw his plea was denied.

On his initial appeal, Britt claimed that his plea was involuntary due to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Fudger v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Coakley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Coakley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Forest v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API