Legal Opinion

Lord v. Lord

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1941No. 2467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

KEMP, J.

This is a motion to quash and dismiss a writ of error. The principal ground of the motion is the failure of the plaintiff in error to give bond as required by section 3556, R. L. H. 1935, which provides:

“No writ of error shall issue until the sum of twenty-five dollars has been deposited to cover costs, and, except in criminal cases and cases in which there is no money judgment, a bond has been filed with the clerk, in favor of the prevailing party in the proceeding in which the error is alleged to have occurred, or his personal repre sentatives, conditioned for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. AylesworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Bishop v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Stewart v. SpaldingHawaii Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Taxes, KobayashiHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Marks v. Waiahole Water Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API