Legal Opinion

G-69 v. Degnan

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 17, 1990No. Civ. A. 86-3282PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROTMAN, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of this Court’s grant of summary judgment as to all claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for money damages against the Attorney General defendants. 1 Plaintiffs also request a clarification of that part of this Court’s order of the same date dealing with the denial of summary judgment of the prospective injunctive relief claims.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

It is unnecessary to repeat the facts outlined in this Court’s August 20, 1990 opinion. It is necessary, however, to present supplemental facts that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Maldonado v. LuccaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. v. ShushanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  4. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Egloff v. New Jersey Air National GuardDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  2. Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n, Act, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  3. P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  4. Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  5. Plaskon Electronic Materials, Inc. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API