Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Finkelstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1962Published

1Concurrence

Van Voobhis, J. (concurring).

In ascertaining what are contemporary community standards, I agree with Judge Dye that other books and publications may be compared which are currently sold by bookstores to the public. This aspect was considered in Smith v. California (361 U. S. 147) in the concurring opinions of Justices Fbankeubteb and Hablan. Justice Fbankeubteb stated:

“ Since the law through its functionaries is ‘ applying contemporary community standards ’ in determining what constitutes obscenity, Both v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 489, it surely must be rational, and therefore relevant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Case v. . PerewNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API