Legal Opinion

Bluff City Lumber Co. v. Bank of Clarksville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from. Johnson Circuit Court; Hugh Basham, Judge; The admission of the fact of partnership by one of the alleged partners is not receivable, in evidence against any of the others to prove the partnership. 29 Ark. 526. That relation can only exist by. virtue of a contract between the parties. 49 111. 439; 41 Ore. 617. A corporation cannot become a partner with an individual. 141 Mich. 604; 133 Fed. 462; 66 -C. C. A. 336. One holding himself out as a partner does not…

Read the full summary

Appeal from. Johnson Circuit Court; Hugh Basham, Judge; The admission of the fact of partnership by one of the alleged partners is not receivable, in evidence against any of the others to prove the partnership. 29 Ark. 526. That relation can only exist by. virtue of a contract between the parties. 49 111. 439; 41 Ore. 617. A corporation cannot become a partner with an individual. 141 Mich. 604; 133 Fed. 462; 66 -C. C. A. 336. One holding himself out as a partner does not thereby render himself liable except to those who have extended credit on the strength of it. 80 Ark. 96; 32 Ark. 733; 29…

1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.

The Bank of Clarksville brought an action against Clarksville Cumber Company, alleging that it was a corporation organized under the laws of. Arkansas, and that the defendant was a partnership composed of Bluff City Cumber Company, a corporation, J. F. Rutherford, D. T. Reynolds and others, and from 1906 until September, 1909, was engaged in buying and selling lumber and • building material in the town of Clarksville, in this State; that soon after defendant began business, as alleged above, it opened an account with the plaintiff, and from time to time borrowed sums of money from it until…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rector v. RobinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Cleveland Paper Co. v. Courier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morrow v. BobbittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. Neas v. Whitener-London Realty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Courtney v. G. A. Linaker Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Baum v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Raywinkle v. Southern Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API