Legal Opinion

Alston, Assignee v. Am. Mtg. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff in error, as assignee, filed an action to sell the real estate of the Hamilton Arcade Company, a corporation, assignor, for the purpose of paying its debts. The defendant in error, by answer and cross-petition in the action, set up its mortgage notes, one for the sum of $55,000 and the other for $12,500. The notes bore interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum after maturity. There were some payments on the notes, and the mortgage company prayed judgment for the sum of $10,400, with interest at 8 per cent. Cn one note, and the sum of $50,000, with interest at the rate of 8 per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Parmelee v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Evans-Snider-Buel Co. v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. Sager v. SchnewindIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Savings Life Insurance v. Financial Affairs Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API