Legal Opinion

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. O'Brien

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant’s challenge to the standing and legal capacity of the plaintiff to commence the foreclosure action is improperly raised on this appeal, since the same arguments were determined adversely to the appellant in a prior order granting summary judgment and the judgment of foreclosure, and he took no appeal therefrom (see generally, GG Mgrs. v Fidata Trust Co., 215 AD2d 241; Spa Realty Assocs. v Springs Assocs., 213 AD2d 781; Cherico v Bank of N. Y., 211 AD2d 961; Williams v Steinberg, 211 AD2d 597; Bank of N. Y., v Route 312 Dev. Corp., 185 AD2d 582).

Furthermore, we find unpersuasive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spa Realty Associates v. Springs AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Lincoln First Bank, N. A. v. PolishukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. GG Managers, Inc. v. Fidata Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Cherico v. Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Bank of New York v. Route 312 Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API