Legal Opinion

Cost v. Dean

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1947No. Appeal, 126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

This is a dispute between lawyers over an attorney fee. Defendant, representing Sophia Krome, prosecuted her claim against the County of Allegheny to a successful conclusion. For this service he received $3,001.10— being 40 per cent of the amount recovered — under a contingent-fee agreement with her. Plaintiff had referred Sophia Krome to the defendant. In this case he contended that, in consideration of the referral, defendant agreed to share equally with him all attorney fees received by him in representing her in a number of related actions. At the trial of the present…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Susser v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Nark v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Saxman v. McCormickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. United States Gypsum Co. v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & MacHine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Northwood, Inc. v. Buriani, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County1973
  2. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. v. Viking Theatre Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1959
  3. Westlake v. Perfection Plastic Engineering Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API