Legal Opinion

Croom v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 1983No. 65657PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of selling marijuana and hydromorphone in violation of the Controlled Substances Act. Held:

1. Error is asserted because the trial court refused to grant defendant’s motion to dismiss his indictment made on the grounds of a violation of due process because there was a 55 day delay between the commission of the offense and his arrest. It is argued that because of the delay defendant could not remember the date of the alleged offense for which he might have been able to provide an alibi defense.

This issue has been decided adversely to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Jarrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. McNeal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Hardy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. State v. MaddenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sultenfuss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Prothro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Briard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Ridgeway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API