Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Ipswich Hosiery Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 13, 1961No. 38948PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
The plaintiff in its brief for the first time raises the issue that there was no proper basis for the defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in that there had not previously been made a motion for directed verdict which is a condition precedent to a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Southwind Trucking Co. v. Harvey, 96 Ga. App. 715 (101 SE2d 223). The record before this court as approved by the trial judge states that the recital of facts contained in the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is approved as true and correct, and this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. Michael M.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Printup v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Belisle v. Berkshire Ice Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Novak v. RedwineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Headman v. RoseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- American Cyanamid Co. v. RingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. BerlyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Broun v. Bank of EarlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Grubb & Ellis Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Bradley Real Estate Trust, a Massachusetts Business TrustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. WillisDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.