Legal Opinion

Ward v. Stroud

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1954No. 3222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

Appellants (plaintiffs below) have perfected their appeal from a summary judgment rendered against them and in behalf of appellees. The judgment is assailed on one point, which is substantially: The trial court committed error in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment because the pleadings of appellants tendered an issue of fact for the jury’s determination:

Appellees’ reply is to the effect that the trial court did not err in granting their motion because their motion and the attached affidavit and pleadings show that there is no issue as to any material fact in this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kaufman v. BlackmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Statham v. City of TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. De La Garza v. RyalsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Haley v. NickelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Palm v. La Mantia Bros. Arrigo CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Sullivan v. Sisters of St. Francis of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Shaw v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Harbison v. JeffreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API