Legal Opinion

Lively v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 23, 1990No. 88-03397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Judge.

Herbert M. Lively seeks review of the trial court’s order of final summary judgment in favor of CSX Transportation, Inc., in a negligence action. We reverse.

Lively had been employed by CSX for twenty-one years as a carman, whose job it was to inspect and repair defective railroad equipment. On the day he was injured, Lively was attempting to extract a piece of scrap rail which had fallen through one of the holes in the flooring of the railroad car used by CSX to transport the scrap rails. The fallen rail had become wedged in the trucks of the car.

The appeal herein is from a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Martin v. TindellSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Adams v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Emig v. ERIE LACKAWANNA RAILWAY COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Yukon v. Granada Construction of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waksman Enterprises, Inc. v. Oregon Properties, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Hendrick v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API