Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 14, 1975No. 26766PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

The district attorney brings this interlocutory appeal from a ruling of the district court granting defendant’s motion to suppress statements made to police officers following his arrest. This ruling was grounded on the district court’s finding that the evidence presented by the district attorney failed to establish probable cause to arrest without a warrant, thus rendering the statements inadmissible under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine of Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963).

An information charging the defendant with conspiracy with his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. NanesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HazelhurstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. People v. BergstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. People v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. Renck v. Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API