Legal Opinion

Whitefield Village Fire District v. Bobst

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 3, 1944No. 3486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

During the course of oral arguments, counsel for the plaintiff was willing to concede that any lien for water furnished to the former owner had been lost since suit was not brought within one year of the last item charged such owner. This view is correct. The statute under consideration does not provide one lien for all charges of gas, water or electricity furnished to all patrons on a parcel of real estate. A lien attaches for each separate account. Accordingly, the provision that the lien shall continue for one year from the last item charged means not against any patron on certain premises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. County of GallatinIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Mechanics Savings Bank v. Collector of TaxesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. TysonOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Town of Ordway v. KaiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bigwood v. Merrimack Village DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  2. City of Portsmouth v. NashSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Diamond Trailer Sales Co. v. MunozNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. The Prospect-Woodward HomeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  5. The Prospect-Woodward HomeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API