In re Kobre
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Petitions to> Revise and Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. In the matter of Max Kobre and Moses Ginsberg, individually and as copartners doing business as Max Kobre’s Bank, 1783 Pitkin avenue (Brownsville), Brooklyn, alleged- bankrupts; also, Max Kobre and Sarah Kobre, partners, doing business as Max Kobre’s Bank, Williams-burg and Manhattan, alleged bankrupts, and Max Kobre and Sarah Kobre, alleged bankrupts.
Read the full summary
Petitions to> Revise and Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. In the matter of Max Kobre and Moses Ginsberg, individually and as copartners doing business as Max Kobre’s Bank, 1783 Pitkin avenue (Brownsville), Brooklyn, alleged- bankrupts; also, Max Kobre and Sarah Kobre, partners, doing business as Max Kobre’s Bank, Williams-burg and Manhattan, alleged bankrupts, and Max Kobre and Sarah Kobre, alleged bankrupts. On appeals and petitions to revise by Bessie-Weinstein, petitioning creditor, to review certain orders.- Three banking…
1Per curiam
The petition to- revise in the Brownsville proceeding is brought by Bessie Weinstein, one of the petitioning creditors in the other proceedings. We think she had no right to intervene in the first proceeding, nor to review the order made therein. However, as the throwing out of her petition would probably only lead to a re-presentation of the same questions subsequently by some one else, we think it best to dispose of them on the merits.
We concur fully with Judge Veeder’s reasoning and conclusion; no one seems to dispute the proposition that Max and Sarah were partners, and there is certainly…
2Cited by4 opinions
- De Rees v. CostagutaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- In re KobreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1915
- In re RussellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1925
- Stitzer Hotel Co. v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932