Crook v. Crook
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Pima. W. A. O’Connor, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The plaintiff prosecutes an appeal from an order denying a motion to amend the return of service of summons and from an order granting a motion to set aside default and to vacate the judgment.
On the trial.of the motion to vacate the judgment, it was the theory of defendant that the court never acquired jurisdiction because of the insufficiency of the proof of service of summons. The service was constructive, and consisted of a publication of the summons and the mailing of a copy thereof and of the complaint to the address of the defendant at her residence in Whittier, California. The defect…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herman v. SanteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ranch v. WerleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907
- Lockwood v. LockwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Alger v. Brighter Days Mining Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Reed v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Allen v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Blair v. BlairArizona Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.