Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Chesapeake Coal Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 26, 1952No. Docket No. 23310Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Tietjens, Judge:

The petitioner has the burden of proving that its excess profits tax is excessive and discriminatory, and to establish what would be a fair and just amount representing normal earnings. Its tax is deemed excessive and discriminatory for purposes of section 722 of the Internal Revenue Code if its average base period net income is shown to have been an inadequate standard of normal earnings for one or more of the reasons stated in section 722 (b). Petitioner relies upon section 722 (a) and subparagraphs (2) and (5) of section 722 (b).1

Petitioner is a member of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Monarch Cap Screw & Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  4. Avey Drilling Machine Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  5. Foskett & Bishop Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API