People v. Miller

Defendant was convicted by a jury of robbery armed. He appeals, claiming that money removed from the glove compartment of a vehicle was seized in violation of his federal 2 and state 3 constitutional rights and further that the prosecutor’s closing argument was inflammatory, contained references to the prosecutor’s own opinion and to the opinion of others, and deprived him of a fair trial.

At the opening of trial, defendant moved to suppress evidence. It is not disclosed why the motion was not timely made, 4 but neither the trial judge nor the prosecuting attorney challenged the timing of the…