Legal Opinion

Berry v. Berry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1957No. 33854PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

This is a proceeding in which a former husband was required to appear and show cause why he should not pay to his former wife money claimed to be due her under a decree of divorce. Despite their divorced status, we shall hereinafter refer to the parties as husband and wife.

We are confronted at the outset with a jurisdictional question, it being conceded that, unless the money claimed to be due was alimony or support money, contempt proceedings were not the proper remedy. Valaer v. Valaer (1954), 45 Wn. (2d) 565, 277 P. (2d) 326; Millheisler v. Millheisler (1953), 43 Wn. (2d) 282, 261 P. (2d)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Heuchan v. HeuchanWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Adams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gordon v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bartow v. BartowWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Millheisler v. MillheislerWashington Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Decker v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Ovens v. OvensWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. DeRiemer v. OLD NAT. BK. OF SPOKANEWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Leverett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API