Legal Opinion
Verdugo v. Seven Thirty One Ltd. Partnership
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 25, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*601Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered September 3, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, as limited by the briefs, granted so much of plaintiffs’ motion as sought (a) to estop defendant Bovis from denying that on the day of the accident it violated Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-1009 (a) and § 27-1018, and (b) to dismiss the fourth and fifth affirmative defenses of defendant Seven Thirty One (731) that injury resulted from the acts of another or independent contractor, and denied so much of plaintiffs’ motion as sought (a) to estop defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Elliott v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Morris v. Pavarini ConstructionNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. PERMANENT MISSION OF NAMIBIACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Castillo v. New York City Department of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- Doorley v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011