Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Callahan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1893No. Appeal, No. 148PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, No. 148, July T., 1892, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1891, No. 661, in favor of defendant, Thomas Callahan, on case stated. Case stated. From the case stated it appeared that defendant sold oleomargarine in the original packages as imported from Illinois, but it was not stated that it was sold as an article of food. No reservation of a right of appeal or certiorari appeared in the case stated.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 148, July T., 1892, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1891, No. 661, in favor of defendant, Thomas Callahan, on case stated. Case stated. From the case stated it appeared that defendant sold oleomargarine in the original packages as imported from Illinois, but it was not stated that it was sold as an article of food. No reservation of a right of appeal or certiorari appeared in the case stated. The court entered judgment for defendant. Hrror assigned was the entry of judgment as above.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

There was no reservation in the case stated oí a right of appeal or certiorari. It follows that the decision of the court below was final.

Appeal quashed.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frankel v. Reliance Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Cobbs v. Allied Chemical Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Clearfield Bank & Trust Co. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Citizens Bank v. LeskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. County of Allegheny v. Allegheny County Prison Employees' Independent UnionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API