Legal Opinion

Fairview Coal Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 2, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after .stating the , facts.) The plaintiff based its right to recover on the common-law liability of the defendant. It is claimed that the facts stated in the complaint constitute a discrimination against the plaintiff.

It 'appears from the record that the defendant had a station and switch tracks at Baris, where it placed oars for the purpose of being loaded with coal for shipment. The defendant had also made an arrangement for a private switch, track with the owner of .the Anthony Hall mine, situated about,one-half of a mile from the plaintiff’s mine. The alleged discrimination on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Wilder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
  3. Gulf Compress Co. v. Alabama Great Southern R. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Clear Lake Lumber Co. v. KuykendallWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whelen Springs Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Straub v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API