Legal Opinion

Joseph J. Froio v. Robert A. McDonald

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided May 28, 2015No. 12-3483(E)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Judge:

Before the Court is the appellant’s application for an award of $11,654.23 for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Secretary filed a response in opposition to that application. The EAJA application satisfies the EAJA pleading requirements. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). The appellant asserts that he is a prevailing party, that he is eligible for an award based on his net worth, and that the Secretary’s position was not substantially justified; and his EAJA application includes a list of fees and expenses sought.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Townson v. GarlandDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API