Joseph J. Froio v. Robert A. McDonald
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Judge:
Before the Court is the appellant’s application for an award of $11,654.23 for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Secretary filed a response in opposition to that application. The EAJA application satisfies the EAJA pleading requirements. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). The appellant asserts that he is a prevailing party, that he is eligible for an award based on his net worth, and that the Secretary’s position was not substantially justified; and his EAJA application includes a list of fees and expenses sought.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Townson v. GarlandDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024