Legal Opinion

(PC) Martinez v. Peterson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 30, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01779Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-1779-DAD-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PETERSON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this action alleging that defendant Peterson 18 violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to provide him with adequate medical care. 19 Defendant Peterson’s motion for summary judgment is pending. ECF No. 75. Plaintiff has not 20 filed an opposition; instead, he has submitted a motion to compel, ECF No. 90, and a motion to 21 appoint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Brooks v. County of San JoaquinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API