Legal Opinion
ROYAL BRADLEY v. Bradley Beach Bor.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 16, 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
252 N.J. Super. 401 (1991)
599 A.2d 1288
ROYAL BRADLEY ASSOCIATES, THOMAS AND DORIS NIEGLOS, JAMES AND THERESA HOLLYWOOD, AND ALICE L. GLOSGOLD, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BRADLEY BEACH BOROUGH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 12, 1991.
Decided December 16, 1991.
Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, BILDER[1] and KEEFE.
Michael I. Schneck argued the cause for appellants (Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer & Gladstone, attorneys; Michael I. Schneck of counsel, Michael I. Schneck and David L. Wecht on the brief).
Lawrence R. Jones argued the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Newark v. FischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- American Hydro Power Partners v. City of CliftonNew Jersey Tax Court · 1990
- 18 Washington Place Associates v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Tax Court · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- DOVER-CHESTER ASSOC. v. RandolphNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- MacLeod v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- State v. Eatontown BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Jos. L. Muscarelle Dev. Co. v. Manalapan Tp.New Jersey Tax Court · 1993
- JC Trapper, LLC v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.