State v. James
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court. cited: Chitt. Cont. 218; 1 Pars. Cont. 42 ; Greenl. Ev. § 68 ; State vs. Page., 19 Mo. 213, 219-20 ; People ex rel.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court. cited: Chitt. Cont. 218; 1 Pars. Cont. 42 ; Greenl. Ev. § 68 ; State vs. Page., 19 Mo. 213, 219-20 ; People ex rel. Tweed vs. Liscomb, 60 N. Y. 559 ; U. S. vs. Magwire, Ap. 1876, p. 273. cited : State vs. Page, 19 Mo. 219 ; State vs. Roebm, 61 Mo. 83 ; Edward-son vs. Garnbardt, 56 Mo. 87; 49 Mo. 298 ; 51 Mo. 269 ; State vs. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400; Hayden vs. Tucker, 37 Mo. 225; Gregory vs. Regina, 15 Q. B. 974; Young vs. TbeKing, 3Q. B. 98 ; People vs. Gates, 13 Wend. 311; People ex rel. Tweed vs. Liscomb, 60 N. Y. 564, and autborities cited by district…
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, Judge
Tbe indictment in this case is founded on Wagn. Stat., 210, § 1, and consists of three counts... Tbe first count charges that defendant being a person unauthorized so to do, did unlawfully create, issue and put in circulation as a circulating medium divers notes, to-wit: two notes, each of tbe denomination of one dollar, and each note evidencing that it would be received in payment of debts and used as a currency and medium of exchange in lieu of *572money, contrary, etc., against the peace, etc., of the State. The second count charges the same offense, and only varies from the first in using the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1861
- State v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
- State v. HerefordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CarmeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. BurrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Ex parte HenkesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1919
- State v. HedrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886