Legal Opinion

Walker v. Mitchell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 12, 1997No. 2960760PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jeanne Walker, the plaintiff in this cause, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants Hercules Mitchell and Geraldine Mitchell ("Mr. Mitchell" and "Mrs. Mitchell") on her premises liability claims. We reverse and remand.

Walker's complaint, which named the Mitchells and various fictitious parties as defendants, alleged that on or about September 18, 1992, Walker fell and was injured while an invitee on the defendants' premises. The complaint further alleged that Walker's fall was the proximate result of the defendants' negligent or wanton conduct in that the defendants…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. SHADES, ETC. v. Cobbs, Allen & Hall Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Intergraph Services Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. Cotten v. ST. BERNARD PREPARATORY SCHOOLCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. Freeman v. FreemanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Cotten v. ST. BERNARD PREPARATORY SCHOOLCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Walker v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API