Legal Opinion
Miller v. Sharpe
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,071PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the Third District Court, City and County of San Francisco. McKee, J. The facts are stated in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 2, by the Court (from the Bench):
This is an action brought for partition of land. The document appealed from is the finding of facts by the Court, and the con-" elusions of law, which do not constitute an interlocutory decree. No decree appears as yet to have been made. There is, therefore, nothing from which to appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
2Cited by5 opinions
- In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Brice v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Bussell v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- San Diego Investment Co. v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Russ v. StillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965