Rader v. Schock
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Latimer
Affirming.
The parties to this action are joint owners of the first two tracts of land described in the petition. Mary Rader and her husband, Elijah Rader, are the owners of a undivided interest, and the remaining plaintiffs •and defendants, some twenty in all, are the owners of the other %. The plaintiffs sought to sell the land on the ground of indivisibility. The appellants, Mary Rader and her husband, opposed same insisting that their Yz undivided interest could be set- aside to them and the land so divided without materially impairing the ■value of the individual shares. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Owings v. TalbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Conyers v. Conyers Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- Watt v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Pack v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
- McGuire v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
- Stevens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952