Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Solomon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 20, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
It has been adjudicated that the parties are husband and wife, living apart by consent. (Solomon v. Solomon, 256 App. Div. 959; affd., 282 N. Y. 565.) Plaintiff was entitled to return to her husband; and bis obligations as such resume upon her return, or upon offer to return on her part and his refusal. (Williams v. Williams, 130 N. Y. 193, 198; Newing v. Newing, 45 N. J. Eq. 498, 503; 18 A. 166.) In the light of defendant’s refusal, he cannot be heard to claim that the offer was not made in good faith. (O’Leary v. O’Leary, 256 App. Div. 130.) Acceptance was an obvious and available means of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Silberstein v. . SilbersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Pearson v. . PearsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Bohmert v. BohmertNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenneson v. KennesonNew York Family Court · 1942
- Campbell v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Solomon v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Solomon v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943