Legal Opinion

Lesage, McNeil and Mostrom v. Colchester, Marchelewicz v. Colchester, In re Colchester Leased Lands

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 5, 2013No. 2012-196PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. The common legal issue in these consolidated cases is whether Vermont law allows the Town of Colchester to consider location-related “intangible” factors in assessing seasonal lakefront camps situated on leased land. We conclude that the Town is not precluded from considering such factors in assessing the subject properties. Accordingly, we reverse the decisions of the superior court and state appraiser reaching the opposite conclusion, and we remand the cases for further consideration consistent with our opinion set forth below.

¶ 2. There are two decisions for our review, one by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Meriwether v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Sondergeld v. Town of HubbardtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Barnett v. Town of WolcottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. Sherburne Corporation v. Town of SherburneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beldock v. Town of CharlotteVermont Superior Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API