Legal Opinion

Potter v. John Hutchison Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Eaton. (Hooker, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The ■ facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This suit was commenced by summons, to which defendant pleaded in abatement that the writ was signed, sealed, and delivered to the attorney for plaintiff in blank, and did not, when so delivered to said attorney, contain either the name of the parties, a statement 1 of the cause of action, the amount of damages, date of issue, or the day of the return. Plaintiff *60demurred to this plea, the court below sustained the demurrer, and defendant appeals.

The issue of writs in the manner complained of is not unusual. Indeed, the practice is general, and with the knowledge and consent of courts.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Constantini v. HoferMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Lucas v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Sweet v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API