Legal Opinion · Dissent

Levy v. Picard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1980No. 78-2223Published

1DissentHurley, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion the majority fails to consider plaintiff’s uncon-tradicted affidavit which resolves any ambiguity as to who owes the money, and conclusively entitles the plaintiff to summary judgment.

Michel Picard intended to buy into Sher-brooke Golf & Country Club, Inc. and to this end he contributed $73,333.33 in cash and signed a note for $60,000.00. Sometime later he changed his mind and requested his money back. At this point, Picard, Levy, Schwebel and Farber executed the letter-document referred to in the court’s opinion. As a result of this agreement, Picard…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fauls v. Sheriff of Leon CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API