State v. Dacke
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered October 5, 1909, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of rape.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Appellant was convicted of the crime of rape, and appeals from the judgment entered. A number of errors are assigned, but we will refer to only one, which, in our opinion, is decisive of the appeal. The criminal code- of 1909 amended the law relating to rape, among other changes making it a crime to carnally know a female child between the ages of fifteen and eighteen years and of previous chaste character. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2436. Appellant was informed against under this new section, the charge being laid in Kittitas county, and the time as June 30, 1909. The state’s evidence discloses…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Childress v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Carpenter v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- People v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Castleberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Cloninger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Lucado v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- State v. SargentWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Branham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.