Legal Opinion

Dees v. Hocker Oil Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1985No. 13616Published

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff sought to recover damages from defendant, contending that defendant had not followed an agreement that it would reimburse plaintiff for a portion of utility charges. Following nonjury trial plaintiff received a judgment in accordance with his request. Defendant appeals.

Relying on State ex rel. M. J. Gorzik Corp. v. Mosman, 315 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. 1958), and Davidson v. Kubalek, 667 S.W.2d 449 (Mo.App.1984), defendant contends that under § 517.710, RSMo 1978, the judgment is void as it was entered by an associate circuit judge more than three days after the case was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. M. J. Gorzik Corp. v. MosmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Davidson v. KubalekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API