Legal Opinion

Zumwalt v. Madden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Curry County: Martin L. Pipes, Judge. Defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

This is a suit in equity to determine an adverse claim to title under section 504, Hill’s Code. To *186maintain such a suit, the plaintiff must allege that he is in possession of the premises, and that the defendant claims an estate or interest therein adverse to him, and call upon the defendant to set it forth in his answer: Goldsmith v. Gilliland, 10 Saw. 610 (22 Fed. Rep. 865); Walton v. Perkins, 10 N. W. Rep. 424.

The complaint is in the usual form. The defendant demurred to it on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of suit. The demurrer having been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Walton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Savage v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hanna v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Mascall v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Woll v. CostellaIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Cooper v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API