Legal Opinion

Hill v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Neosho District Court. Action by Orvilla Miller and others against Theron S. Mill, to cancel a certain deed. Judgment for plaintiffs, at the December term, 1889. The defendant brings the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

*660Opinion by

Green, C.:

This was an action to set aside a deed made by Newell Hill to his brother Theron S. Hill, and dated June 4, 1887, and recorded the November following, to the southeast quarter of section 14, in township 27, range 17, in Neosho county, alleged to be worth, at a reasonable valuation, $4,00.0.

The plaintiffs below, Orvilla Miller and Dora MeCowaD, were daughters of Newell Hill; Alice Hill was the widow of his sod, Cicero Hill; and John was a grandson. Newell Hill, with his wife and children, formerly lived in Richwood, Ohio, where they owned a home, which they sold, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paddock v. PulsiferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cardenas v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Slayback v. WittIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Overstreet v. BeadlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API