Legal Opinion

In re Wagner

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1965No. 10926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Original proceeding.

Petition of Karl A. Wagner, an inmate of the Montana State. Prison, appearing pro se, seeking the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges he is illegally confined without due process of law in that at the time of his trial counsel was appointed by the district court for his defense but that such appointment was made over his objections; that the court refused to grant a continuance of the trial and that such ap-. pointed counsel had only a short period to prepare his defense; that such alleged actions by the court deprived him of his right, to effective…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Petition of EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Petition of ParrettMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In re WagnerMontana Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API