Legal Opinion
Pokoik v. Village of Ocean Beach
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John Copertino, J.
Motion to dismiss the second amended complaint granted; cross motion to compel service of an answer denied as moot.
This is an action seeking a declaration that section 145-9 of chapter Í45 of the Ocean Beach Code, as amended by Local *317Laws, 1990, No. 3 of the Village of Ocean Beach, is null and void (CPLR 3001). Plaintiff also seeks a declaration that "Local Law 3 of 1990 is in violation of 42 USC § 1983,” an injunction against enforcement of the new law, money damages and a reasonable attorney’s fee.
The bases of the present motion are that the pleading…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pokoik v. Village of Ocean BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992