Legal Opinion
Cambiano v. Neal
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 16, 2000No. 00-283PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lavenski R. Smith, Justice.
This is an attorney discipline case. Appellant Mark Cambiano appeals from an order of the Conway County Circuit Court dismissing his counterclaim. In his counterclaim, Cambiano sought injunctive relief against the interim suspension imposed by the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct pursuant to Section 7J of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at law. Cambiano contended that Section 7J violates both state and federal constitutions. In conjunction with the dismissal, the trial court also certified its…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jefferson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Cambiano v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Ligon v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Chandler v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.