Legal Opinion

Newcomb v. Burbank

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 18, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Raw. On demurrer to answers.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This action is claimed by plaintiffs to be at law, and no objection is made to that form of proceeding. The complaint alleges that the defendants, individually and as executors, have wrongfully converted certain bonds and accumulations to the possession of which plaintiffs are entitled, and wrongfully claim to hold such securities as part of the estate of which they are executors. The separate answers interposed by the defendants, after denying the material allegations of the complaint, set forth that as executors they rejected the asserted claim of the plaintiffs, and,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Valengin's Administrators v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Claim for a Ring of Van Slooten v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Wall v. . Kellogg's ExecutorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Dunham v. FitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Moran v. MorrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nye v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Minnesota Odd Fellows Home v. PogueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API