Legal Opinion

W. C. Hardesty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 19, 1948No. C. D. 1092PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

In this case plaintiff seeks refund as drawback under section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 of 99 per centum of the duties paid on the importation of certain material used in the United States in the manufacture of stearic acid and oleic acid which was subsequently exported from the United States.

None of the facts of importation, manufacture, and exportation are in dispute, the issue being limited to the question of whether! there was on the part of the plaintiff compliance with the customs regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under the authority of section…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. DohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Spencer, Kellogg & Sons (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. American Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Union Towel Supply Co. v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API