Legal Opinion · Dissent
City of Cleveland v. Heben
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 1991No. 58229Published
1DissentKrupansky, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion since while I agree defendant’s conduct may have been ill-mannered, his conduct posed no “actual or imminent” threat to the administration of justice.
A direct contempt of court, with which defendant was charged and summarily punished, is statutorily defined as follows:
“R.C. 2705.01 Summary punishment’for contempt.
“A court, or judge at chambers, may summarily punish a person guilty of misbehavior in the presence of or so near the court or judge as to obstruct the administration of justice.”
“By both statutes and judicial decision a court is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State ex rel. Seventh Urban, Inc. v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.