Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Cleveland v. Heben

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1991No. 58229Published

1DissentKrupansky, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion since while I agree defendant’s conduct may have been ill-mannered, his conduct posed no “actual or imminent” threat to the administration of justice.

A direct contempt of court, with which defendant was charged and summarily punished, is statutorily defined as follows:

“R.C. 2705.01 Summary punishment’for contempt.
“A court, or judge at chambers, may summarily punish a person guilty of misbehavior in the presence of or so near the court or judge as to obstruct the administration of justice.”

“By both statutes and judicial decision a court is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Seventh Urban, Inc. v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API