Legal Opinion
Granite Roofing Co. v. Casler
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiff is a manufacturer of a patent roofing in Pittsburgh, Penn. Defendants were contractors doing business in Port Huron, in 1886. Negotiations were entered into between them relative to the handling and sale of this roofing by the defendants, and resulted in the following written memorandum:
“ Port Huron, Mich., May 19, 1886.
“ This is to certify that I have given Casler & Co., of Port Huron, Mich., the full control to handle our patent granite roofing for the county of St. Clair, State of Michigan; also, Croswell, Michigan; Lexington, Michigan; Imlay City, Michigan; Capac, Michigan.
“Grani…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Heywood v. Doernbecher Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Dr. Koch Vegetable Tea Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Bicking v. StevensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.