Legal Opinion

Funderburg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1986No. 268-83PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of injury to a child. V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 22.04 (Supp.1986). Punishment was enhanced by two prior convictions and assessed at life imprisonment. V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 12.42 (1974). In an unpublished opinion, the Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed. Funderburg v. State, No. 11-82-228-CR (Tex.App.—Eastland, delivered March 10, 1983). We granted appellant’s pro se petition for discretionary review to determine whether appellant was denied the right to represent himself at his trial.1…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Nethery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Hathorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Scarbrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  5. Oliver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API