Eckhardt v. Village Inn (Vicorp)
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
We granted certiorari to consider whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the decision by the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) to terminate future worker’s compensation benefits payable to the claimant, Richard K. Eckhardt. In an unpublished opinion, the court of appeals held that the Colorado Workmen’s Compensation Act, now called the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), does not require an employer and/or its insurance carrier to act reasonably in withholding consent to a compromise or settlement of a suit by an injured employee against the alleged third-party tortfeasors.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott Wetzel Services, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Tate v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- County Workers Compensation Pool v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Kirkham v. Hickerson Bros. Truck Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- Matter of Death of PeterkinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Buscher v. BoningHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- ITT Specialty Risk Services v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mason Jar Restaurant v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Metro Glass & Glazing, Inc. v. OronaColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.