Legal Opinion

Martin v. Foti

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 31, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-2759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.

This matter was tried before the Court, sitting without a jury, on February 3, 1983. At the close of trial, the Court left the case open for the purpose of allowing defendants time to locate and submit in evidence the three disciplinary reports referred to at trial, and which defendants had been ordered to produce at trial by minute entry dated March 25, 1982. Those reports having now been produced, the Court, after review of the record in this matter, the evidence presented, and the applicable law, rules as follows.

To the extent that any of the following…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bosworth v. WhitleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Gregory A. Lucas v. Benny O. Hodges, Administrator, Lorton ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Lindelo M. Dzana v. Charles C. Foti, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Clark v. BrewerDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1983
  5. Franklin v. StephensonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API