De Tolna v. De Tolna
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This appeal is from a judgment awarding the plaintiff a divorce, and comes here on the judgment-roll alone. No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the findings, nor as to the rulings of the court on the trial. It is argued by appellant that the finding as to plaintiff’s residence is outside of the issues made by the pleadings, and hence, erroneous. The complaint contains three counts, and in each count it is alleged, “That plaintiff is and for more than ten years last past has been a resident of the state of California, and of the city and county of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Nev. Cty. & Sacramento Canal Co. v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Woodham v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Giletti v. SaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Griffin v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Alden v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Perry v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Southern California Commercial Co v. AlbertiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Downing v. DoneganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.