IGT v. High 5 Games, LLC
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge:
IGT and High 5 Games, LLC ("H5G") each contend that the opposing party has violated a provision of their contract related to the approval of trademark uses. IGT contends that H5G failed to remove uses of IGT's trademarks following IGT's rejection of their proposed uses. H5G, in turn, argues that IGT's refusals were unreasonable, and thus IGT is in breach of the contract. At the heart of their current dispute is how to define "reasonable" approval.
For the following reasons, the Court adopts the following definition for determining whether…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Lisa Petrosino v. Bell AtlanticCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- LAW DEBENTURE TRUST CO. OF NY. v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- International Multifoods Corporation v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Nielsen v. AECOM Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sarah Valelly, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026