Legal Opinion · Dissent

Skelley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1938No. A-9239Published

1DissentDoyle, J.

I am unable to agree with the conclusions reached by my colleagues upon which the judgment of conviction is reversed.

It is not a pleasant duty to express one’s dissenting views. However, in the present case, believing the majority opinion overrules what has been well-settled law of this jurisdiction, I feel bound to do so.

To a correct understanding of the issue presented the following brief statement of the facts disclosed by the testimony is made; also excerpts of the testimony of some of the witnesses, and of the defendant as a witness on her own behalf.

The theory of the prosecution was…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Pinder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Kennamer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Mulkey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API